Have you ever seen or had a patient that has been doing exercises (maybe even ones that you've prescribed) for some specific muscles, but they continue to test weak, despite weeks or months of doing the exercises? It doesn't make sense. A weak muscle should respond to exercise right? What should you do at this point? There are 3 possible answers that I want to go over, in no specific order. First, and perhaps most obvious, the patient may not be loading or performing the exercise properly. For example, if the patient is performing a clamshell, but instead of hip ER, they are rotating their spine, the muscle isn't being properly stimulated. That doesn't mean that there isn't still a benefit to the exercise, but it may not develop strength properly. In regards to loading, if a patient can perform an exercise for 20 or 30 repetitions, they may improve muscle endurance or neural activity, but it's unlikely strength changes will occur. One of our first steps with exercise prescription should be ensuring proper technique and appropriate dosage. Second, the muscle may not be improving in strength due to neural inhibition. If there is insufficient neural input, the muscle will have difficulty fully firing, despite the load that is put on the muscle. For example, if the femoral nerve has decreased nerve conduction due to restricted lumbar mobility, the quadriceps may not improve strength even with hundreds of squats. With these patients, our goal should be to improve the neural mobility at each point of restriction. At that point, the muscle may test completely strong without ever having done one strengthening exercise. An example of this is when a patient with weak L5 myotomes tests completely strong simply with some sideglides or press-ups. Finally, a patient may not progress in strength due to non-musculoskeletal issues. Issues can include conditions like multiple sclerosis, fracture, tumor, etc. But biopsychosocial factors can absolutely contribute as well. With how powerful the mind is, there may be some individual factors that are blocking any potential strength improvements. More medical conditions obviously warrant further testing and referral to the appropriate practitioners, but the biopsychosocial factors can be addressed by us as physical therapists. So how do we handle the next patient that comes in with weakness not responding to exercise? I recommend first checking the form for the exercise and how the dosage has been. Should those be correct, assess for any nerve or mobility restrictions that may be causing neurogenic inhibition. Address those restrictions and re-check the strength deficit. You should be able to see some change relatively quickly. If the patient fails to respond to those techniques, do some additional fracture, UMN lesion, cancer, etc. screening and refer out, depending on the results. -Dr. Chris Fox, PT, DPT, OCS
4 Comments
Bri
4/26/2018 04:45:23 pm
I’m not a PT yet but curious if you get to step three and you are referring them out and they have already had the standard blood work done, who would you refer them out to? Ortho? Neuro? Someone else?
Reply
Chris
4/26/2018 07:25:59 pm
Hi Bri,
Reply
Miguel Hernandez
9/11/2020 10:43:20 am
I been through all three steps and still have not figured it out. My hips which are both replaced. Left one is 18 years old and the right is 10 years old. After eight weeks of PT there has been no improvement in my left hip. Very weak. Do you recommend a step 4?
Reply
11/23/2021 07:28:24 pm
I need to know why my muscles are always weak no matter how many times I excercise or lift weights.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Learn residency-level content on our
Insider Access pages Archives
July 2019
Categories
All
|